| 王贵祥.建筑史学的危机与争辩[J].建筑师,2017,(4):6-15. |
| 建筑史学的危机与争辩 |
| Crisis and Argument in Methodology of Architectural History |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 建筑史学 危机 方法论 宏大叙事 兰克史学 后现代 |
| 英文关键词: Architectural History Crisis Methodology Grand Narrative Historiography of Ranke Post Modernity |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 3695 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 本文是对2017年两次小型建筑史会议上出现的有关建筑史学思想的一些争论，以及大家共同意识到的当下建筑史学所面临的危机进行的辨析。论文讨论了建筑史学研究方法论上的通史与案例研究问题，分析了建筑史学思想的现代性与后现代性问题，关注了建筑史应当关注历史还是关注当下的问题，也讨论了建筑史学作为一门学问，究竟是有用还是无用的问题。论文希望对当前社会对建筑史学科存在的一些不同的看法，或建筑史界本身对于自己学科的一些不同观点，加以讨论与厘清。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The paper is focused on some controversy about architectural history thought which appeared in the two small meeting of architectural history in 2017 and some analysis have been done on the crisis faced by the academic area of architectural history. We have discussed the methodology problem of a general history of architecture or a typical research on some historical building cases and have analyzed the problems of modernity or post-modern in the area of architectural history. Some attentions have been paid on the problem like that as a subject the discipline of architectural history is useful or useless? The author hopes to discuss and clarify some different views on the subject of architectural history in the current society or some different viewpoints on the subject of the discipline itself. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
