| 李海清.分合之辨：反思中国近现代建筑技术史研究[J].建筑师,2017,(5):29-34. |
| 分合之辨：反思中国近现代建筑技术史研究 |
| Introspection on the Narrative Approaches: Researching of the History of Architectural Technology in Modern China |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 中国近代建筑、技术史、叙事路径、环境调控、建造模式 、现代转型 |
| 英文关键词: Chinese Modern Architecture, Technological History, Narrative Approach, Environmental Management, Building Mode, Modern Transformation |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 991 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 检视中国近代建筑技术史研究的历史与现状，梳理出材料结构技术观和环境调控技术观两类叙事路径，并指出其相互分离、缺乏互动与融合之不足。应基于营造人工环境、控制能量交换的整体环境观，从建造的意图（目标）与路径（手段）之互动关系入手，进一步扩展与深化相关研究。“内在的美”跳脱了经典建筑学对于“建造的诗学”之视觉依赖，而从更为贴近建造活动本质属性的层面扩展了研究视野；对于中国近现代建筑而言，在保温型、选择型和再生型三种环境调控模式中，前二者因建造模式更具在地性而应更具研究价值。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Reviewing the history and current situation of the research on the history of Chinese modern architectural technology, this paper combs the narrative path of material-structural technology and environmental management technology, and points out that they separated from each other and lacked interaction and integration.In a further step, the paper suggests the research need to be expanded and deepening, based on the integrated environmental view that constructing arti fi cial environment and control the energy exchanging, starting from the interaction between the intention of construction (target) and path (means).“Internal beauty” jumps away from the visual dependence of classical architecture on “built poetics”, and extends the research horizon from the level of closer nature to the nature of construction activities.For Chinese modern architecture, between three kinds of environmental management mode including protective, selective and regenerative modes, the former two should be more research value because of the more locality of the building mode. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
